CRM Blog | Social CRM

The Thursday CRM Blog

Archiv der Kategorie CRM Software

Mind the gap: ERP meets CRM

Aug 26

Gepostet von David Duncan in CRM, CRM Projects, CRM Software | Keine Kommentare

Travelers on the London Underground are used to taking a big step when the train carriage stops at a curved platform. A similar mismatch exists when ERP and CRM systems need to be interfaced, but the solution is not so simple.

Most solutions for CRM Users involve either the import of data to CRM from ERP or direct access to the ERP systems, but this is not what CRM users really want. CRM users need:

• indicators, when things go wrong or not according to plan and

• aggregated figures or KPIs with the ability to drill down when needed.

ERP manufacturers have tried to create their own integrated CRM applications, for example SAP or SAGE, only to find that CRM apps must be considerably more flexible than ERP systems and that a tight integration makes the CRM System inflexible. More on this in a later post. The solutions of these companies now supplied are in fact not tightly integrated at all, they only appear to be.

Of course, this can be done by importing large volumes of ERP data, but this redundancy is not beneficial to performance or flexibility. A better solution is to insert a middle layer of multi-dimensional data so that CRM Users can use simple dashboards for their data access.

Typically products such as SAP Netweaver or BW are in a position to supply suitable data, but BW projects tend to be long and complex and make it difficult to keep up with sales people who change their requirements often dependent on market and sales conditions.

The most economical and practical solution is to introduce a middle layer and to use products such as QlikView or Dundas Dashboard to present and manipulate data. There are more products available, but it happens that I have recently been involved in evaluating these two.

It is surprising that CRM integrators often ignore this middle step. Controllers would never think of going directly to raw data during the financial planning process.

Tags: , , , ,

What is missing in CRM Software?

Aug 20

Gepostet von David Duncan in CRM Software | 2 Kommentare

Sometimes giants can learn from dwarfs. Comparing enterprise software is small scale solutions, it is surprising how often the enterprise solutions lack basic functions supplied by their smaller relations. Manipulation of addresses for example is much better in a product such as cobra CRM PLUS or SalesLogix than in solutions von SAP or Oracle. One would think that entrprise solutions supply ergonomic solutions for a simple process such as creating a new task based on a completed task and showing later the chain of events. Try doing this, you will be surprised how little functionality is around.

Tags:

Why CRM Software has not developed over the years

Jul 29

Gepostet von David Duncan in CRM Projects, CRM Software, Customer Relations | Keine Kommentare

The last two posts have been pointing to the limitations of CRM software. It is true that software functionality has not changed much since the first CRM solutions were offered, but usability and flexibility has shown a massive improvement.

Why do the applications not develop? Basically the tools customer oriented users require are not that complex and are limited in number and type. The tools are available and have been for some time. A tool alone will not help you however, just as little as owning a hammer will drive a nail into a wall. There is nothing wrong with the hammer, but you need to know what to do with it. The same applies to CRM Products. As stated in a previous post, there are solutions available for almost any CRM requirements, but first you must know your requirements.

These are the steps you need:

  1. Define your business aims with regard to your growth plans and planned customer base. Then define your strategy for reaching these aims from the point of view of the customer.
  2. Define your business processes in relation to your business aims. Business processes in sales and support are not in any way complex, but they do need attention to detail and need to interface to back office functions. Sales processes must remain flexible. Back Office processes tend to be more strict.
  3. Translate your processes to software requirements that support your information flow and work processes. Do not let your IT-Department talk you into making a check-list of functions and certainly not into a technology oriented selection process. Your processes are important.
  4. After all this, go ahead with the software selection process. Let suppliers show you how their software can support your process. In the short list stage it may be worthwhile investing in the development of a module from all short listed companies.

Many CRM projects start with having an IT-oriented employee research information on existing solutions and the development of a list of requirements based on the functions offered by products favored by that person (or team). This is the wrong track. Start a step 1, not at step 4!

Tags:

CRM as it could be

Jul 22

Gepostet von David Duncan in CRM Projects, CRM Software, Customer Relations | Keine Kommentare

Contrary to popular practice, CRM consulting is about putting the customer at the center of your business, not about internal efficiency. In most of the cases I have been recently involved in, customers have been primarily concerned with the improvement of existing internal processes. This makes life easy for the consultant or software sales person, but will probably neither lead to reduced costs nor to increased sales.

Finding and retaining customers is becoming increasingly difficult as loyalty is no longer to be expected and competition increases at all levels. To be successful, it is essential to look at your company from the customers point of view. Is your company behaving the way in which your customers expect? Are you supplying sales and support services which your customers expect? Or is your company more concerned with internal efficiency than with customer needs? You do not need a CRM product to increase sales efficiency – most sales people require little more than a good contact management tool, CRM becomes effective when you prospects and customers notice an improvement.

CRM is not software and in fact most available solutions can support your operation. CRM is about knowing your customer’s requirements and putting a strategy in place to find, develop an keep them. Are you looking at your CRM Software with regard to this aim?

Generally, software suppliers will suggest a workshop to define your requirements. That is generally correct, but whether before or after the sale, these workshops will always be conducted with regard to the limitations of the software offered. Sales people know that your budget is limited and will avoid suggesting improvements which, due to software limitations, will be too costly

You must define your aims and requirements without reference to a product. If you are unable to do this with internal resources, find a consultant who is not tied to a product. However, you are still the only person who can define your business aims.

There is no need to fear that you will then not find a suitable CRM product to meet your needs. There are enough excellent solutions on the market.

Tags:

Why has CRM not developed in 15 years?

Jul 16

Gepostet von David Duncan in CRM Projects, CRM Software | Keine Kommentare

Sales Partners of CRM Software suppliers are by definition more interested in selling you software than in helping you develop a CRM solution. Most of them only work with one or two products, so to them, your problem always look the same.

This characteristic is unfortunately actively encouraged by buyers who look for functions and technical requirements but are not aware of the real business aims involved. There are probably no functions which can be requested which existing CRM solutions do not offer, so using lists of functions will not produce valid results. The quality and the usability of those functions in your environment is another question.

CRM suppliers and resellers can be exptected to have good expertise with regard to their products and good sales people who can show you their solution the way you like to see it. However, even though it is often thought that customer care and sales are the same everywhere, this is definitely not the case. Sales and support processes are always unique. Selecting CRM Software which has the largest number of ticks against your requirements list will not get you the best solution. You will hear talk of best practices from your CRM Rep, but there are no best practices which fit all companies.

If you are looking for more than simple contact management, CRM Software will always need to be modified, so you need to look for suppliers who can understand your business and convince you that the software they are offering can be modified to your requirements.

The sales person who points out these traps will bring you a better solution than the person who tells you the software will do it all for you.

The advice is as old as the hills, but is as true as ever: Don’t let software drive your business, define your requirements and then look for software which fulfills your business needs.

More follows.

Is CRM moving back to SFA?

Jun 28

Gepostet von David Duncan in CRM Software, Customer Relations, Marketing | Keine Kommentare

Looking back to the beginnings of software for sales and marketing, we have seen “Computer Aided Selling”, “Sales Force Automation”, “1to1Marketing” and now “Customer Relationship Management”. Although suppliers and experts speak about the need to communicate with customers and offer 360 degree customer views, the majority of the RFPs I see tend to center arount the improvement of sales efficiency.

This can probably be explained by the increasing cost of sales and decreasing sales margins but does ignore the advantages which could be gained by looking at sales processes from the cutomers point of view. Aiming at decreasing costs usually involves simplifying current processes and not on reviewing the processes in total. It also has the side effect that products promising simple and quick implementation tend to be preferred.

Increasing efficiency and reducing costs are certainly valid aims when introducint a new CRM system, but the real advantages of a new system should include processes which would not be possible without the use of software. Sales, Marketing and Service functions can be integrated  to improve the total service level to the customer not only be reducing administrative loads, but also by offering new services.

CRM on your iPhone or Blackberry?

Jun 18

Gepostet von David Duncan in CRM, CRM Software | Keine Kommentare

Once again iPhone-Hype is everywhere and CRM-suppliers are quick to offer interfaces. The approach differs from product to product – some provide online access to the database, others download date to the phone. The most common use is to check or find customer names or contacts when on the road, but most apps go further with a variety of functions. E-Mail and Call are of course to be expected on a phone, but some products provide access and edit functions for activities, opportunities or orders.

While the access to address and contact data is certainly useful, it is worth thinking if further functions are worth what they cost. This will vary from application to application and certainly from industry to industry, but in many cases the small display and limited data entry speed on the iPhone (Blackberry is faster for most users) limit the practical usage.  it is probably better to turn to a notebook witha  larger screen and a real keyboard – it may not be trendy, but it does encourage more careful use.

Tags: ,

International CRM applications

Jun 16

Gepostet von David Duncan in CRM, CRM Software | Keine Kommentare

International companies will tend to centralize IT-applications where possible and it appears that CRM-solutions are now being targeted.  This may seem reasonable but there are many arguments against centralization in this area. One recent example I found in a large pharmaceutical concern. A regional manager was looking for a CRM-solution for his agents in the Middle East, the agents being anything from a one-man company to a specialized sales organization with up to 15 employees. The manager was told by his IT, that the only CRM-solution allowed in the company was SAP. I need not comment on that. The manager was determined to find a solution and in fact did – the solution he found was not declared as a CRM-system.

The point is, that CRM-solutions are only effective when the local sales processes can be supported and a one-man company just does not have the same processes as the German operation with many thousands of employees and a gigantic sales force.

Adapting an enterprise application to suit local conditions has two major disadvantages:

  • the cost of customizing is extremely high, and
  • the massive customizing produces an application nothing like the original.

It is in fact often more effective and much less costly, to install suitable products in each country and to generate interfaces as required.

It is also absolutely essential to analyze and react to local requirements, even within Europe methods and processes change from country to country. Further, requirements vary according to the size of the sales operation. One memorable near-fail of a project occurred for example when a company in the automotive industry assumed that all vehicles could be identified for their lifetime by the registration number – the system designers were based in the UK.

Tags:

How to select CRM Vendors for a short list

Jun 2

Gepostet von David Duncan in CRM, CRM Projects, CRM Software | Keine Kommentare

Selecting ten vendors out of the 140+ vendors in the (German) market is not a task for beginners. The tendency is to go for the big names, but this does not necessarily get you the best solution for your requirements. Many of the lesser known suppliers have excellent products and may match your needs better than a product purchased on the basis “the product has so much functionality, we will find what we need in their somewhere” (this is a quote from a recent prospect). Firstly, this may not be the case and secondly, disposing of unwanted functionality can be an expensive business.

These are the steps you need to take:

  1. Define your infrastructure requirements
  2. Name the required interfaces to groupware, ERP or other essential software
  3. Decide if you wish to be a small customer of a large vendor or an important customer of a smaller vendor or if this is a factor at all
  4. Name the major modules you require such as sales, marketing and support and the most important processes required
  5. Work with an experienced consultant or use online services to make a list of 20 vendors
  6. Reduce the number to 10 and off goes your RFP

Use the responses to the RFP to form your opinion about the product and the quality of the reaction to your request. Qualified vendors or partners will suggest that they need to know more about your application before sending you a reply. This is in fact correct and a sign of competence, but you cannot spend time with up to 20 suppliers. The RFP, as explained in a previous post, must allow suppliers to show their strengths and not just be a list of check boxes.

On the basis of the reactions you may want to invite around 5 suppliers to a presentation. It is better to have these people demonstrate one or two processed in detail than to give a general tour of their product. Any skilled sales person can make a good impression if he just shows the chocolate side of his product. Invite users to attend the presentations.

This process will enable you to select a maximum of 3 suppliers to run a preliminary workshop with you, the aim of which is to give you deeper knowledge of the product and the implementation partner and for the partner to be able to estimate the project costs and effort.

Tags: , ,

Working with consultants

Mai 31

Gepostet von David Duncan in CRM Projects, CRM Software | Keine Kommentare

Here we need a distinction between the well known consultancy organizations such as Accenture, Bearing Point or Deloitte and freelance consultants or small specialized companies.

Large companies will tend to talk to large organization, so let’s start there. Accenture and similar organizations will tend to give the impression that due to their size, they have specialists for everything. To a certain extent this is true, but it is generally surprising how few specialists for each topic there are and it is also true that there will be virtually no people with in depth knowledge of several products, so be sure to look carefully at the qualifications of the staffing proposed. Of the three main project phases

  1. requirements definition
  2. product selection
  3. implementation

these organizations are well suited to assist in phases 1 (maybe) and 3 (recommended), but should not be involved in  phase 2. Large organizations are interested in selling large numbers of consulting days and this is more likely with a product such as SAP than of say Pivotal CRM, so it is not difficult to guess which product will be recommended.

Freelancers and small partnerships may well be involved in phase 2. Do not expect these consultants to know all the CRM Products in detail. They will know however, which suppliers have a good track record in your line of business and will be able to assist you in the selection process. The selection and the responsibility for the selection remains with the buyer. These smaller organizations may will be involved in phase 1 if the number of potential users is not too high.

Tags: , ,

Rss Feed Tweeter button Facebook button Linkedin button Webonews button Youtube button